Re: "Xtee"


Hugo van der Kooij ()
Sun, 29 Mar 1998 17:26:40 +0200 (MET DST)


On Sun, 29 Mar 1998, Dr. Joel M. Hoffman wrote:

> I'm still a bit jealous that Win95 users get to access their desktops
> without making any changes, but we Unix users have to setup a new
> desktop to be shared. While this is great when moving from station to
> station, running Xvnc and vncviewer on the same machine instead of
> just (in my case) Xfree86 has its problems.
>
> So my first thought was to take on the task of merging the Xvnc
> sources with Xfree86, so that my current X server would also act as a
> vnc server. But I don't know anything about the X sources, and so I
> don't have the time I would need to do this.
>
> So my second thought is this: Is an X program like the unix "tee," but
> bidiretional, feasable? That is, how hard would it be to make a dummy
> X server that just multiplexes two other X servers, sending all the
> I/O from one to the other and vice versa. Then it would be possible
> to run XFree86 and Xvnc on the same desktop. Would this work? Is it
> hard?

Chech the archive for comp.os.linux.announce as I have seen something
similar pass by some time ago.

Hugo.

        +------------------------+------------------------------+
| Hugo van der Kooij | |
| Oranje Nassaustraat 16 | |
| 3155 VJ Maasland | (De man met de rode hoed) |
        +------------------------+------------------------------+
    "Computers let you make more mistakes faster than any other invention in
      human history, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila."
                (Mitch Radcliffe)



This archive was generated by on Wed Feb 03 1999 - 15:33:10 GMT